Jump to content


KL Russia
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited


About Shunix

  • Rank
  1. Good day, Actually the resource has been detected according to Web-AV's URL check subsystem (and it is not the case of SafeSurf subsystem usage). Currently this detect should be unblocked (according to the reply of our analyst's detection group this resource has quite ambiguous reputation, so it might be detected again in future). Anyway, if you have any concerns about incorrect detection of WebAV's URL check subsystem, you are welcome to send requests to newvirus@kaspersky.com. Thanks for your post! With best regards, Alexander.
  2. /* I duplicate the post from Russian version of the topic devoted to the black list of Anti-Banner */ Thanks to everyone for any activity shown in the topic! A piece of news. Those who use Anti-Banner along with Firefox, now is able to use an unofficial version of the plugin for this browser. The installation process is quite easy - you just need to download the file, remove .zip extension (so, you will have just .xpi), then activate this file through Firefox browser - the installation of the plugin should start automatically (as a result you will get the item added to the context menu that will allow you to add the appropriate record to the black list of the component - the same way it is done in case of IE). I hope further the plugin will be included in the official package of KIS (i.e. it will get the official status). Best regards, Alexander. Link to download: kis_anti_banner.xpi.zip
  3. Good day, Yes, why not? It will be very helpful - if you look at the Russian version of the topic, you will see there are lot of people who suggest possible masks and records for adding to the database. It is better to post them along with the links to the resources that will be blocked by these masks/records. Thanks in advance! With best regards, Alexander. P.S. I hope other members will follow your example .
  4. Actually this feature was in the previous versions of KIS as well. If you look in the manual, you will see the explanation that might clarify the issue for you. Practically saying it means that you will have scripts (including its dynamically generated content) checked by Anti-Banner. Should you enable or not this feature - it is a question of your personal choice. The positive thing - you will have dynamically generated content checked and blocked (when necessary). The negative thing - it might be aggressive enough as it is heuristically-based (currently we don't have a slider to control the level of its aggressiveness).
  5. Good day, Yes, it has been fixed practically immediately after the post. Thanks for your help! As for the address to submit suspicious phishing URLs (or false positives) - you are still welcome to use newvirus@kaspersky.com. With best regards, Alexander.
  6. Спасибо - будет исправлено с выходом того же обновления! С уважением, Александр.
  7. Добрый день, Спасибо - данная проблема будет исправлена со следующим выходом обновлений баз Анти-Баннера. С уважением, Александр.
  8. RuslanAl и a_n_y_a: такая проблема действительно возможна. Для ее разрешения можно предложить следующий workaround: не используйте "Высокий" уровень ограничений. Лучше выставить "Рекомендуемый" уровень, после чего зайти в настройки категорий и выбрать соответствующие (дополнительные, если не устраивает предложенный набор) категории. Проблема с блокировкой указанных сайтов (по причине баз) должна исчезнуть. С уважением, Александр.
  9. Good evening, Thanks for the replies. I hope that this topic will help some people in resolving any issues related to the Anti-Banner component. As practice shows not everyone is courage enough to ask support when there is problem with incorrect AD blocking (or AD missing). And it may be much quicker and better to solve such troubles through discussion (again as practice shows ). As for suggestions – actually in my point of view it is useful to post them here. Of course, it doesn't mean that all of them will be implemented in future versions of the component but the most useful (and really required) probably will. Why not? As for me I hope this topic will be tracked persistently (at least, with group of enthusiastic people who are interested in improving the database and the component itself) in the way it is done in the original topic created by Russian-speaking users. With best regards, Alexander.
  10. This topic is created as a branch of this topic (devoted to problems, suggestions and issues of Anti-Banner for Russian users) for English users. Here you will find an unofficial list of banner-related records that might be used for your own use (this list is updated from time to time according to the requests that users post on the Forum). You are welcome to post here problems, suggestions, etc related to Anti-Banner component. For instance, if you have blocked content of the page (that shouldn't be in fact) you are welcome to post the URL of the page and the appropriate copy of report. And vice versa – if some banners are missed, you may point out our attention to it. Together we will make the database of Anti-Banner component better. P.S. Now we start new service – direct request form for our components: «Parental control», «Antibanner» and «Antiphishing». Here: http://support.kaspersky.com/content/helpdesk.html All requests sent through this form will be processed by KL employees who work on these component databases, and they will always reply directly to your request in all cases. So, welcome. Thanks. With best regards, Alexander.
  11. Обновление для megashara.com выйдет со следующим обновлением. Спасибо за замечание! В связи с тем, что основная часть запросов, связанных с обновлениями официальных баз, разобрана, думаю, будет логичным оставить одну главную тему для обработки ложных срабатываний, замечаний, комментариев и пр. Просьба все проблемы излагать там. Эту тему можно закрыть.
  12. Здесь речь идет о совсем другой маске, которая была в т.ч. и в старых базах. Кроме того, данный сайт по тематике полностью соответствует тому, с чем призван бороться Анти-Баннер.
  13. На самом деле маска *porno* действительно присутствовала в базах (и в т.ч. и в списке), хотя не должна бы - модуль Анти-Баннера не является Родительским Контролем. (Кстати, с маской *banner* официальные базы описываемых проблем никогда не имели, а вот эту проглядели.) Будет исправлено с выходом следующего обновления баз. Соответственно, проблемы с yandex'ом и porno.com'ом должны после этого исчезнуть. Всем еще раз спасибо за замечания! Как всегда, если будут какие-то проблемы, просьба обращаться - все запросы рассматриваются и учитываются. Что же касается "молчаливого" ответа Анти-Баннера (когда в ответ выдается "пустой" контент при фильтрации) - пожалуй, тут лучше проглядывания отчетов компонент в продукте ничего не придумаешь...
  14. Спасибо за дополнительную информацию. Со следующим выпуском баз проблема должна быть разрешена - необходимости добавлять сайт в белый список быть не должно.
  15. Какая у Вас версия KIS и версия баз? С последними базами от 29.01.2009 10:18 Анти-Баннер в KIS 8.506 данный сайт не блокирует (такой маски в базах нет).
  • Create New...

Important Information

We use cookies to make your experience of our websites better. By using and further navigating this website you accept this. Detailed information about the use of cookies on this website is available by clicking on more information.