@Zlowred последнее китайское предупреждение. Это уже третья тема на форуме где вы даете ссылки на опасные сайты, несмотря на то, что вам уже неоднократно объясняли, что нужно с ними делать. Увижу четвертую - будет бан.

тема закрыта. все ответы и разъяснения даны в https://forum.kaspersky.com/topic/проблема-с-сертификатом-в-яндексбраузере-moved-3157/?page=2#findComment-218574

Через антивирус касперского на компе))) Сайт https://support.kaspersky.ru/b2c/ru#contacts Вот так надо мочить, а не делать вид , что делом заняты!

То есть если к примеру сбер не подаст жалобу на то что используют их торговый знак и подрывают их честь и достоинство, крайний сбер? Я согласен , но вопрос почему они не пишут жалобу? В чём причина, а действительно ли не было заявлений ? Печально и грустно🫥 Можно было бы и быстрей это делать, просто все сидят и не хотят ничего делать, а когда предлагаешь , все хвост поджимают https://rutube.ru/video/23925b64c33a32b28a31902722576902/?r=wd ССылка рабочая , а никто не проверяет что там каждый день свежий фишинг , который можно было за 10 минут заблочить как тока появится свежая ссылка https://goo.su/9SNJb Ума хватило тока в базу ссылку добавить , а потом хоть потоп, мыслить совсем не умеют , лучше блочили прямые фишинговые ссылки новые , ане переходные , по которым их можно отслеживать😁

Hello @Chr1s, Welcome! Sadly, no, in September 2019, Kaspersky Developers said: "We are glad to inform you that your request has been considered and added to the list of suggestions that will be implemented on the future versions of Kaspersky Internet Security for Android." Since then, in 6 years, 2 months, 1 day: Crickets, zip, zilch, a big fat NOTHING!! Which is a damm shame, for an Android environment, the ability for the *user* to manually manage & exclude files detected by the AV is essential. In the most recent version there's absolutely nothing that meets this criteria: Kaspersky, Android_11.126. We'd like to know why, however, due to Kaspersky's ballsed-up change management process all the 'communications', including one from a Kaspersky 'supervisor', have been what we would categorize as gaslighting... Kaspersky simply close the related cases & the *original-necessary-change* is buried in the bowels of Kaspersky unless & until some poor-creature decides to endure the whole process again.... To which we say, why bother - OR - alternatively, good luck, hope results are forthcoming in (yr) lifetime. Thank you🙏 Flood🐳+🐋

status update: they asked for wireshark logs KSeC traces and a video recording while the dns lookup failed. did that this morning, expecting a reply by midnight so i should get a confirmation that they understand the issue by tomorrow. 👍 guessing it will take another week to fix.. im surprised QA didn't spot this. this has been happening since i updated around the start of the month for me.

Hello @MightierPen, Thank you for posting back! We didn't think your topic *was* a request for Kaspersky to support Brave. We provided steps/process/procedure & resources for *you* to submit a request bc *you* said: "But would be nice to have these types of exclusion rules anyway." We gave *you* a tip to not refer to Brave when submitting the request to Kaspersky 'cause 'they'd prolly focus on 'Brave, not supported, blah, blah, blah' & waste a lot of your time - we were trying to save *you* some grief. Thank you🙏 Flood🐳+🐋

Hello I recently switched from Norton to Kaspersky and very happy with the switch. My experience on the phone is less good. I have a kaspersky on my android and have an APK used to test phone root status. Kaspersky tells me it's a virus. It's not but probably uses undocumented features to test if the phone is rooted. It offers me skip option, which is fine. Until the next scan when it nags again, and again, and again. Per this topic below permanent exclusions was added to the request list in 2019. Anyone know how this is getting on? https://forum.kaspersky.com/topic/android-exclusions-always-skip-known-file-cross-post-merged-closed-6919 Thanks Chris P.s. I don't want to turn off scanning entirely... That's what I did with Norton and defeats the point and these kind of nagging messages is one of the reasons I left them.