Direct links are not allowed here inside posts/threads to avoid spam, also signatures were surely banned in user profiles for the same reason, in previous K. forums signatures were allowed long years ago, but Mods had constantly managing to remove external links there 🙂

Hallo @scope, evtl noch eine kleine Info zu den bereits guten Antworten von @Schulte und @Longlife. Verwaltung der Kaspersky-Einstellungen per Fernzugriff erlauben Wenn dieses Kontrollkästchen aktiviert ist, können vertrauenswürdige Fernverwaltungsprogramme (wie TeamViewer, LogMeIn Pro und Remotely Anywhere) die Einstellungen von Kaspersky ändern. Nicht vertrauenswürdige Fernverwaltungsprogramme sind nicht berechtigt, die Einstellungen von Kaspersky zu ändern, selbst wenn das Kontrollkästchen aktiviert ist. Die komplette Hilfe zum Selbstschutz: Info Selbstschutz LG Tschekker

Проверьте корретность системной даты https://support.kaspersky.ru/common/windows/3508 Обновите корневые сертификаты https://support.kaspersky.ru/common/error/other/12489

Выполняю Weak Settings Scan и получаю в конце вот такое сообщение: Шрифт в центре экрана отображен меньшим размером шрифта, чем аналогичный текст в других окнах. Для сравнения подобный же текст у модуля PC Speed-Up: Размер шрифта одних и тех же элементов ГУЯ в разных окнах должен быть идентичным.

@CM2024 Welcome. Please see how to cancel auto-renewal

I switched to another security suite and thought that I had canceled my subscription with Kaspersky. But just recently I receive a notification on my phone saying that I will be billed $91 or something in June as an auto-renewal. So I am trying to reach someone, an actual person, mind you, not idiot AI, and of course I get fed back into the "Virtual Assistant" every time I try to contact an actual human being. HIGHLY unethical behaviour. I expect it from some Scammer company in Delhi, but I don't expect it from a company that is supposed to protect people from scammers! The irony is unbelievable. Deliberately hiding the means to unsubscribe is ILLEGAL. This is criminal behaviour.

Just so that you don't think I am a "heretic," I would like to share some thoughts . . . On a global scale, I think the Ukraine situation has damaged Russia's reputation in North America. Regrettably, it has cost Kaspersky many customers. Their security products are second to none, in my humble opinion, after only a few days' experience with KP, and I have used many security products over the years. I am 71 now and started with computers back in 1988, in the days of DOS 3.1. I am delighted to have finally found Kaspersky Premium. It is an outstanding product, but there are always minor quibbles . . . On the subject of Malwarebytes, I have two lifetime licenses. I am sure that I would not pay the outrageous prices for Malwarebytes Premium (MBP) now. I would keep Malwarebytes Free, as I advise my customers to do, and I would run weekly scans or scans when I thought it necessary, as I do now with MBP. Malwarebytes is good, the best, at what it does. It targets PUMs, PUAs, PUPs, browser hijackers, etc. I classify those as "nuisance malware," but they DO seriously interfere with computer resources and with the users' enjoyment of their computers. Genuine antivirus programs tend to largely ignore those nuisances. Malwarebytes is not a true antivirus solution, despite their deceptive advertising. https://forums.malwarebytes.com/topic/311423-scanning-pdf-files-for-malware/?do=findComment&comment=1633149 That reply was written recently by the current most prolific volunteer on their Forums. I can cite another MB Forum member's opinion from a few years back, written by another one of their "top guns." MB Forum management doesn't dare take down those posts. Have you looked at the AV-Comparatives Lab test results? https://www.av-comparatives.org/tests/summary-report-2023/ That crew is universally accepted as the best there is for objective, unbiased testing of antivirus products. Do you see Malwarebytes even listed? Even Microsoft submits its Windows Defender for testing. They do not do badly, but we all know Kaspersky took the "Product of the Year" award last year, which is why, when I left Bitdefender, there was only one choice for me. Kaspersky has been consistently in the top five for years now. Why is it that MBP isn't being tested by AV-Comparatives? Does the AV-Comparatives Lab not regard their product as a genuine anti-virus, OR is it because Malwarebytes doesn't want to get clobbered and undermine their deceitful advertising as a genuine antivirus solution? You can answer that question; I have. In answer to the question: if I had to choose between KP or MBP, which would it be? The answer is obvious: Kaspersky. I was deemed a "heretic" at the BD Forums for my well-founded opinions. Cybersecurity is all about layers. When I was disinfecting computers as a BC Malware Removal Specialist, no final topic was concluded without an MBAM scan. https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/t/407147/answers-to-common-security-questions-best-practices/#entry2413189 I am introducing myself as a new member, but I also wanted to create this post so that I could use it to link to when K-Support Tier 2 contacts me. And so, back to my basic point: we, the users, should be able to dismiss that "incompatible software" warning. Even BD was not that territorial. There are a lot of external links in this post. I am sorry but I guess I am going to keep your Moderator busy! 😉 Way better than the BD Forums, where you could not even post a screen image until you were "Level 2" and including links required the permission of their Forum Admin. These Forums are far more civilized. Let us discuss whether "Mother" Kaspersky should issue us a Warning that cannot be dismissed. Let us also hope that she will allow us to create a Forum here to discuss product improvement suggestions. I'm sorry for being so verbose in this post. 😢 Brevity is regrettably not a component of my character. 🤷‍♂️ Regards, Phil