I am not using its protection/privacy/antivirus features, which is only a small part of many of its functionalities (and can be easily disabled). More over, there weren’t any conflicts with KAV, until the last update would flag it as a false positive (not even allowing its exclusion in the simplest manner). The problem is looking at users issues from a single standpoint, ignoring everything else, which is not a “customer-centric” approach and can lead to conflict of interests. On my part, there were no conflict with KAV whatsoever, and it should be my decision to make KAV leave it alone or (worse) whether I should use it, not yours. Please, consider that users are also human beings who can be aware and take steps by themselves on those matters, because their needs and requirements with their own PCs are not necessarily the same as yours. Thank you, I will try that EDIT, yes, adding “**” to the path seems to have resolved the issue! Thanks again. Note that I’m also using iObit Anti-Malware engine, which is a very good complement to KAV (using a good engine, unlike iObit ASC’s protection features that are useless). Hopefully you won’t flag it in future updates… xD