The big SWITCH from Kaspersky to ultra hated security

[smyliedude]

Recently, we've been forced to switch from Kaspersky to Ultra VPN or Ultra security, whatever that's called. We do not like it. We do not like being forced to choose something that we weren't given a right to look into or even seek out another option, therefore, I wonder if anybody else. Has been forced to use this company. They say it's good, but I've not done any research. I know that Nord is a very good reputable company. I'm going to go with them because that's my choice, not because the U. S. Government said I had to use a different 1 and then they chose it for me. I just don't agree with that. So is anyone else in that predicament too, where they want a full refund? I have nine years worth of subscriptions and over 20 devices that I cover. And I just don't feel like it's right that they can choose for me. II just, I don't believe that that's right. Anyone else feel this way?

 

Now that I read my question, I think it's imperative that we are able to get a full refund and choose whichever company we like to go with. We shouldn't be forced into using a new company because they're not allowed to operate in the US anymore. That's my choice where my money goes. You don't just refund or tell me what sorry your car doesn't run anymore. Here's one you're going to use. No, you get to pick the car you're going to use, just like anything else. This is not a monopoly from the U. S. Government telling me which. security company to use is BS. This demands a full refund. And looking into a lot more than this, just accept the security company that we're giving you. I don't think so.

[CLEsports]

FYI, Nord is primarily a VPN software, with anti-virus as a second thought and isn't a full anti-virus replacement.