[How to prevent an app. from loading a driver?]

Can app. control prevent an app. from loading a driver?  I donot see the item in the app. control interface.

[A question on inherit of app. rules]

If you have it set to ‘Inherit’ for the child process, and you modify the settings for the parent process, yes, the child process will take the parent process custom rule. 

If the child has a custom rule (not ‘Inherit’), it cannot inherit, since the inheritance has been disabled in favor of another setting.

 

Thank you!

[A question on inherit of app. rules]

Hi @jony327 , 

Its both, the inheritance works from the application group (for example, Trusted) down to the process. 

If you change the settings for one of the processes or application, it will break the inheritance and start using new custom settings. 

It seems that the son process will take all the rules of its father process although the son process already has its own rules in the app. control rules window. Is that right?

[A question on inherit of app. rules]

https://support.kaspersky.com/KSOS/8.3/en-US/24749.htm

I am talking about the meaning of inherit in the Application Control rules.

[A question on inherit of app. rules]

I amnot quite clear about the meaning of inherit of app. rules in KB. Does it mean the inheriting of  the rights of  father process or just those of the attibuted group? 

[The unknows objects which have been recorded by ksn for quite some time are reliable?]

I know why.  It exists but is covered by a wrongly attributed software vendor.  This bug, as I heard, was also reported by other users.  

[The unknows objects which have been recorded by ksn for quite some time are reliable?]

Another question is that the snaptimer( an app. trusted by ksn) doesnot appear in any of my app. groups although I have run it many times. It is very strange . It is the only exception I have noticed. Do you know the possible reason?

[The unknows objects which have been recorded by ksn for quite some time are reliable?]

In my understanding such dynamic anlysis had been performed when an object was first uploaded to ksn.  Therefore all the existing “unknown” objects in ksn had passed the above analysis so that they are safe in some degree. Am I right?

[The unknows objects which have been recorded by ksn for quite some time are reliable?]

Like lumerical daemon which appeared in ksn 3 years ago.

[The unknows objects which have been recorded by ksn for quite some time are reliable?]

I notice that there are a lot of objects which  have been recorded by ksn for quite some time and are still labelled as unknown. Are these objects ignored or recognized as uninjurious ? Can they be regarded as safe in some degree?