Hello Kamille,

Why do you display SuperAntiSpyware as "suspicious" ?
On the forum everybody considers SAS as a trustfull application
with no compatibility issues ...

Best regards

Berny +++

It may be a good idea: on that way I'll finally get my first green code!

Thank you Gulliver , let's wait for Kamille's reaction now

Berny ++

I really would like to understand the reason why SUPERAntiSpyware is "suspicious" and Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware is not "suspicious".

Hi ,

Perhaps because SAS to install drivers, unlike MBAM .

MBAM does as well...

MBAM does not use a hook, or?

It also uses a driver, it wouldn't be capable of detecting and removing complex malware if it wasn't the case.

Actually, the aim of the suspicious tab is, for me, to highlight all softwares related to security so i don't think I should remove it...

I also added "Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware" in the detection script.

Hello Kamille,

Thank you for your comments and i agree with your point.

Finaly i understand now why "Firetrust MailWasher Pro" is also listed here.
"Heuristic Virus Scanning : MailWasher Pro blocks potential viruses by examining
each email for any code it thinks is suspicious and could indicate a virus."

I've got a red code on my XP user (7 unknowns + 17 incompatibles)
but knowing the background i don't worry

Best regards

Berny +++

Perhaps rename it to something less hostile... perhaps just "Possible conflicts" or something

Fine! Now I've got my orange code instead of the first green one....