 KIS 7 over KIS6 |
  |
 25.07.2007 22:25
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member  Group: Members Posts: 42 Joined: 4.04.2007  |
I installed 7 right over 6 and everything seems fine, all settings saved. Is there any setting I should change? Any new settings that should be turned on/off?
Thanks |
 |
 
|
|
25.07.2007 22:33
Post
#2
|
|
 Global Moderator Group: Global moderators Posts: 25602 Joined: 7.04.2005 |
Not really, but if you see the slightest problem, then please uninstall completely and at the max keep activationdata, reboot and reinstall fresh.
-------------------- |
|
|
|
|
25.07.2007 23:34
Post
#3
|
|
 Professional Group: Members Posts: 2616 Joined: 30.12.2006 |
You can also keep the antispam database. That wouldn't cause any problem either. I have never heard of a problem with it.
-------------------- Un saludo!
 Intel Pentium 4 3.2 Ghz, MSI 945P NEO-F, 1024 MB DDR Ram, ATI X850XT-PE, HDD 250 GB, Audigy 2 ZS, Windows XP SP2, KIS 7.0.0.125 |
|
|
|
|
26.07.2007 01:07
Post
#4
|
|
 Professional Group: Moderators Posts: 17899 Joined: 19.11.2005 From: Toronto/Canada |
So is this version faster for you?
-------------------- Networking and Security Guru
~^Whizard^~ |
|
|
|
|
26.07.2007 01:48
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 42 Joined: 4.04.2007 |
QUOTE(Whizard @ 25.07.2007 18:07) So is this version faster for you? [right][snapback]404966[/snapback][/right] Works about the same after not scanning port 80 |
|
|
|
|
26.07.2007 01:52
Post
#6
|
|
|
Professional Group: Moderators Posts: 17899 Joined: 19.11.2005 From: Toronto/Canada |
That is of course the risk you are willing to take by not scanning HTTP Traffic for malware
 -------------------- Networking and Security Guru
~^Whizard^~ |
|
|
|
|
26.07.2007 03:04
Post
#7
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 42 Joined: 4.04.2007 |
QUOTE(Whizard @ 25.07.2007 18:52) That is of course the risk you are willing to take by not scanning HTTP Traffic for malware [right][snapback]404981[/snapback][/right] But if it gets past that, wont the realtime av catch it? |
|
|
|
|
26.07.2007 03:13
Post
#8
|
|
|
Global Moderator Group: Global moderators Posts: 25602 Joined: 7.04.2005 |
QUOTE(nixie21 @ 26.07.2007 02:04) But if it gets past that, wont the realtime av catch it? [right][snapback]404989[/snapback][/right] Mostly, yes, but nowadays there are some clever malware around exploiting via the browser, so thats why the web-av was developed. -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
26.07.2007 03:31
Post
#9
|
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 42 Joined: 4.04.2007 |
QUOTE(Don Pelotas @ 25.07.2007 20:13) Mostly, yes, but nowadays there are some clever malware around exploiting via the browser, so thats why the web-av was developed. [right][snapback]404991[/snapback][/right] Well that stinks  the speed hit it takes is bad when it is on scan port 80. |
|
|
|
|
26.07.2007 03:36
Post
#10
|
|
|
Global Moderator Group: Global moderators Posts: 25602 Joined: 7.04.2005 |
QUOTE(nixie21 @ 26.07.2007 02:31) Well that stinks the speed hit it takes is bad when it is on scan port 80.[right][snapback]404994[/snapback][/right] Not for me, not even near bad, i generally never notice it & for most it's the same, but yes some see significant slowdowns and there are usually a thirdparty involved and this is of course the tricky part discovering which. P.s. You should be ok with port 80 unchecked though if it's bad. -------------------- |
|
|
|
|
26.07.2007 04:29
Post
#11
|
|
|
Professional Group: Moderators Posts: 17899 Joined: 19.11.2005 From: Toronto/Canada |
Exactly, something is definately conflicting. As I stated before you will need to check your setup. You will always take a perfomance hit, as the traffic must be stopped and scanned. No other suites provide a faster implementation than KIS
-------------------- Networking and Security Guru
~^Whizard^~ |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22.11.2009 04:53 |